You have permission to edit this article.

Self interest trumps rationality on mass transit

  • Updated
  • 6 min to read
Self interest trumps rationality on mass transit


The Central Indiana mass transit plan hit a massive roadblock

of Democratic and Republican making on Thursday in the Indiana House of

Representatives' Ways

and Means Committee


The committee, in a 10-11 vote, declined to advance the HB1073, a

bill that would have endowed Central Indiana communities with the authority to

vote on whether to approve a 0.02 percent tax increase to implement a regional mass transit



The bill's demise can be linked to political posturing on

both sides of the isle, little of which pertains to the substance of the bill


Tax rhetoric unhinged

Republican opposition rests in the flawed logic that voting

for the bill is akin to voting for a tax increase. In fact, it's a vote for

local control. If the General Assembly passed the bill and the governor signed

it, taxes would not increase.

It would take a referendum vote by each regional county that

wants to participate to decide for itself – through a referendum vote

— whether the enhanced design, connectivity and efficiency the plan

offers is worth a fractional income tax increase.

The voters are free to vote no.

But this reality did nothing to dissuade lawmakers such as

Rep. Matt Ubelhor, R- Bloomfield, from insisting that passing a bill that permits

citizens to vote on a tax increase is the same thing as lawmakers raising


"It gives the people the right to vote, it also gives

the city-county council a say," Ubelhor said in a brief interview

following the committee meeting.

"I don't think that mass transit at this time is

anything we need to be giving the authority to raise taxes on and vote on."

People not indoctrinated into the logic of political reality

may wonder at what point it became problematic for people to have the right to


or the city council to have a say on what happens in the city they

were elected to represent.

But in a culture where the Americans for Tax Reform no-new-taxes pledge

holds people captive to sound-bite mentality, General Assembly observers say it

is too difficult for attacked Republicans to defend the fact that a vote for

the mass transit bill is not a vote for a tax increase. It's easier for them to

avoid having to explain anything.

Not all Republicans parroted the tax increase line, however.

In fact, more Republicans than Democrats ­— by a 9-1 margin —

voted in favor of HB1073.

One of them offered classic Hoosier philosophy to justify

her vote:

"I feel that every district does what's best for their

area," said Rep. Rebecca Kubacki, R- Syracuse, before she cast her yes

vote. "I'm not going to step in the way of progress in a community that

wants to see this move forward."


Greg Ballard

and Gov.

Mitch Daniels

, both Republicans, also advocate for locals' right to take

the mass transit plan to a referendum vote. Ballard's first order of business

following his Jan. 1 second-term inauguration was to head to the Statehouse to

round up support for the plan.

Just over a week later, Daniels addressed the issue in his state

of the state address:

" ... we should trust the people of Central Indiana

with the decision whether to raise local dollars for mass transit if they

believe it crucial to their future quality of life."

The mysterious ways

of the Ways and Means chair

The commitment of the bill's author, House Ways and Means

Committee Chair and Rep.


, R- Uniondale, is not as straightforward.

Espich, who has been a member of the Indiana House of

Representatives since 1972, was the only lawmaker that took the legislative

initiative to author a mass transit bill this session. But, if he were truly

interested in allowing the locals to decide whether the regional mass transit

plan was in the area's best interest, he made some curious decisions in the

language he used in the bill.

First of all, the Central

Indiana Transit Task Force

projected a 0.03 percent increase on local

income tax was necessary to actualize the regional mass transit plan. Espich's

bill only extended the authority for a 0.02 percent increase.

Then, as the session progressed without action on the bill,

he told reporters that he was having trouble finding support "because

nobody wants to be associated with a tax increase."

Next, he included contentious labor language that —

because federal labor law governs entities such as IndyGo

that are dependent on federal transportation funds — served no other

purpose than to rile up the Democrats.

Before calling a vote on his bill, Espich offered an

amendment which, "in the spirit of compromise É does delete a portion of

the labor language which is a concern to some."

But he left in language that a worker should not be forced

to join a union as a condition of employment – a concept already addressed

in the comprehensive right-to-work


that House Republicans had passed just the night before after an epic

legislative battle.

NUVO contacted Espich's media liaison repeatedly for

clarification on whether his labor language accomplished something outside the

scope of the right-to-work bill passed by the House or the federal law that already

governs contract negotiations of IndyGo workers. No response.

One additional mystery on the GOP side of the equation: If

Ballard and Daniels support the referendum, why has House

Speaker Brian Bosma

, R-Indianapolis, not rallied behind the cause?

Democrats take the


What happened next might come as a shock to those who assume

that Democrats elected to represent Indianapolis might fight for any possible

improvement to the city's mass transportation system.


Bill Crawford

, D-Indianapolis, was the first to respond to Espich's "compromise."

He called the labor provisions "superfluous verbiage É (that) has no

impact on the functioning of the metro transportation system."

Superfluous, maybe, but consequential enough for Crawford to

conclude, "I will vote against the bill if that language remains in the


The language remained in and Crawford, and five of his

Democratic colleagues voted against the bill.

By virtue of the fact that mass transit in Indy currently

runs on unionized labor, Rep. Win Moses, D-Ft. Wayne, formerly the mayor of

that city, argued that "moving forward with a bill with this labor

language is effectively saying we don't support mass transit."


Cherrish Pryor

, D-Indianapolis, offered up both Espich's

lower-than-necessary funding language and the right-to-work labor provisions as

justification for her no vote.

"If we're thinking regionally É (point zero) 2 percent

does not get us to a mass transit system," she said.

"I've spoken to various (city-county council) members

and they've clearly expressed to me that they would not vote for a mass transit

referendum if there's labor language in the bill," Pryor added. "This

bill still has part of the right-to-work language in there. Effectively, we

didn't give the locals the opportunity to vote for the bill because we put

language in there that they were not going to be supportive of."

It's strangely reminiscent of the tax rhetoric. The fact

that the right-to-work language would have no baring on the workers affected by

the plan is not important — what is important is that Democrats can't go

on record as supporting right-to-work language.

The bill's co-author and the only Democrat to support it, Peggy


, of Bloomington, said that she might suffer political consequences

for her stance.

Despite her distaste for the right-to-work language, she

said, "I try to look at things globally the best I can; I see the value of

this bill. É Even in Bloomington they see the value in terms of moving forward

in the State of Indiana."

Easy riders

Even after watching political infighting destroy the bill in

which they'd placed so much hope, the broad-based lobbying coalition backing

the regional mass transit plan exited the hearing not in indignant huff, but

with the calm patience of experienced parents who had witnessed such childish antics

countless times.

Their resolve could be heard throughout the hallways, "every

legislative idea has nine lives ... the session is not over ..."

Here's a sampling of the post-hearing reaction:

"We were surprised that it died. ... If right-to-work had

been voted on why do we have to muddy the mass transit bill? Mass transit is

important to move this city forward. We don't need to politicize it; it affects

everyone at some point or another." – Maggie


, president, Indianapolis-Marion County City-County Council

"Community consensus won't go away; this won't slake

the thirst of the public for mass transportation." – Ron


, executive vice president, Central Indiana Corporate Partnership

"We've got to keep working ... and play a role in

promoting the spirit of compromise." – Ehren


, executive director, Central Indiana Regional Transportation


"We believe to be a first-class city we really need to

think about mass transit — we support the mayor's initiative."

– Jennifer Thuma, associate general counsel, Indianapolis Airport


"Those who voted for it understood they're giving

voters the right to choose." – Tim Maloney,

senior policy director, Hoosier Environmental Council

"I am disappointed that our Central Indiana regional mass

transit plan didn't make it out of committee in the General Assembly. I am

hopeful we can find a way to move forward on the discussion before this session

of the General Assembly adjourns. Investing in a modern, efficient regional

mass transit plan is vitally important to the future growth of Indianapolis and

Central Indiana." – Mayor

Greg Ballard

"We understand this is a process. Hopefully further

discussion and a clearer understanding of the importance this legislation has

to central Indiana will result in a path to allow residents to decide their

priorities relating to mass transit through a public referendum." – Jessica

Mitchell, communications manager, Indianapolis Public Transportation


The Indiana Citizens' Alliance for Transportation is

collecting signatures in support for the Regional Mass Transit Plan at

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.










Society & Individual