It's over, at last. The Indiana primary, that is, not Hillary Clinton's march to the Oval Office, though most every outlet has called it quits for the Senator. Their proof, though not often mentioned, is that she has been loaning her campaign more of Bill's lavish, unspeakably high, speaking fees. But she still won Indiana and by winning, however closely, helped Jill Long Thompson to win, however closely, the Democratic gubernatorial nomination, giving her the chance to go up against MY MAN MITCH. "Jillary" was the true insurgent candidate, not supported by the state's Democratic establishment and will give MMM a fight, though he will be able to swamp her with money. But she has a chance, whereas the architect would just have gone through the motions, waiting to get back to his lucrative work. So women had an effect in the Indiana primary, but not enough of an effect to give Hillary Clinton an impressive victory, just a victory. North Carolina was a different case for Obama, but who cares about North Carolina? It has been a Republican state for a number of presidential races. Bush beat Kerry there by over 400 thousand votes in 2004, a 12 percent spread. Does Barack Obama expect to find that amount of new votes for himself there in November? This remains the heart of the Hillary Clinton argument to the Superdelegates to throw their lot with her. I won the states that matter; he didn't. And there's some truth to that. Save Illinois, she has taken most of the big states that Democrats need to win. When one looks at a map of the 2004 election (here's one: http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/president/ ) Kerry's states look like just a handful. It is always a surprise to realize Kerry would have won the election had he been able to win Ohio. In the primary contests Hillary Clinton won the contiguous sweep of New York state, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana. Obama won Illinois and Wisconsin. Of course, it is likely Michigan and Florida would have gone, as they sort of did, to Clinton, had the states not altered their primary dates. Again, the Democratic primary season has been haunted by the Ghost of 2000. Obama looks like Gore: he wins the cities and the college towns; and Clinton looks like Bush. She wins the open spaces. That's how Indiana went, as well as most of the states Obama has won. Ties are ties. Obama does look like the putative nominee to be, but he will have a hard time of it in the states Democrats shouldn't have a hard time in. And it certainly isn't clear what Hillary's exit strategy is, if any. But I'm sure she's considering one now. Here's my version of what it may be.
OK, she can't tear the party apart by fighting last stand style. What can she be offered down the road? The veepship? It would be nice, but not likely. She could be offered by the party upper ups the position of senate majority leader, as some have been whispering. That would give her leverage regarding policy, perhaps even more so than being a sitting vice president. It's hard to know what is good about the bad or bad about the good, but her opposition, even her supposed meanness against Obama, can be seen as a plus. It oddly makes her future support, if it comes to that, more effective, meaningful. It wouldn't be much of a turn around if everything had been lovey dovey up to now. If she throws her support to Obama, it will be seen as more real, will be expressed effectively as a pragmatic choice given the actual opposition, the walking wounded John McCain. So, the Clinton campaign may well go through West Virginia, but the Superdelegate discussion will go on behind the scenes, as well as discussion with other party big wigs. When Bill Richardson turned his back on the Clintons I thought he was applying for the vice presidency on an Obama ticket. That may well be. In the woudacouldashoulda world, I continue to think that had Al Gore picked John Kerry instead of Joe Lieberman for veep, the resulting ticket would have been able to batter the draft dodger George W. Bush, despite Florida's butterfly ballot. I think an Obama/Clinton ticket in 2008 would be the equivalent of what Gore/Kerry would have been in 2000. But, we'll see what choices are made down the road. The Democrats, for a long time, haven't been as smart as they ought to be.