Wednesday, May 16. 2007How long must we wait before the satire can begin?
So yesterday we lost a dear friend. Yes, I am speaking of that holy man of God, the Reverend Jerry Falwell...
Now, I must admit, I was not particularly moved by Jerry's passing. That doesn't mean that I was celebrating or anything, mind you.
This morning, though, I was forced to deal with Falwell's death more directly with a decision to be made. A friend invited me to join a group on Facebook. Its title: "I want to get pregnant so I can have an abortion on Jerry Falwell's grave." I was conflicted. Respect for the dead versus satire? Which would prevail? I shrugged and joined the group. Since joining the group I've gotten two responses from my Christian friends. The first was one pointing out the insincerity of the group but admitting, with a little bit of guilt, that she did find it funny. She later wrote a note saying that we shouldn't express such hate toward Falwell. Personally, though, I don't hate Falwell. I don't think the sentiment expressed in the group's name is based on hatred. It was something I would explain when confronted again by a Christian friend. This second friend thought it was "extremely wrong, insensitive, immature, and thoughtless" to join the group. He insisted that I was "better than that." I responded:
My friend insisted that "words mean something" and that they can't just be thrown out to get a laugh. (Something I'd dispute, but that's another argument.) He also said that it was wrong "especially one day after his death." And that makes me wonder... How long does one have to wait before making satirical comments about the dead? Because as I've said, the reason I ultimately decided to join the group was because its sentiment was one of satire, not of unoriginal, predictable, boring hatred. Looking back on it now, though, I kind of wish that the satire had been even better. For example, more in tune with Falwell's eccentricities. How about instead: "I want to perform a partial-birth abortion and then a Satanic ritual, while wearing a Tinky Winky Costume on top of Jerry Falwell's grave for a cover photo for Hustler Magazine." Now THAT would have been much better. THAT is satire. sat·ire –noun 1. the use of irony, sarcasm, ridicule, or the like, in exposing, denouncing, or deriding vice, folly, etc. 2. a literary composition, in verse or prose, in which human folly and vice are held up to scorn, derision, or ridicule. Now the thing I wonder about.... What if I'd joined this group two weeks from now, or a month from now? Would I still have received the same messages of disapproval? What if instead of Jerry Falwell we reaped similar satire on a conservative figure who's been dead longer? Say Nixon or Reagan? Or I know, what if we blasted someone worse than Falwell. Say that it was Fred "God Hates Fags" Phelps who died. What if I created/joined a group that was "I want to commit sodomy on top of Fred Phelps' grave." What then? I suppose when it comes down to it we should just be nice to each other. We shouldn't speak ill of the dead or whip out the sharp knife of satire. We should all be children of God, bathing one another in love. We should be civil and serious in our discussions. Is there a time and place for satire? Is perhaps this simply too soon for satire? Do some figures repeatedly commit acts throughout their career that would make them worthy of ridicule? Perhaps Jerry Falwell has given us something in death which he could never really give us in life: something to actually think about. Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
I doubt your friends were so righteous after the execution of Saddam Hussein. True, he was a mass-murderer, dictator, etc. But he died. Ergo, vis-a-vis, concordantly...American Iraqis shouldn't have been partying in the streets.
But, really, they should have. A terrible, terrible man was dead and gone. Now, Falwell is no Hussein, I know. But Falwell was still a terrible, terrible man. He was a liar, a demagogue, an opportunist, a bigot, a racist, and a hateful, spiteful human being. He incited droves of people against persecuted minorities. He distorted a peaceful message of Jesus Christ into a superiority complex, a moral war. He used people's belief in a god to make money and further his own personal bias. The ONLY reason your friends invoked a "speak no evil" of the dead Falwell, and not Hussein, is because of religion. In life, Falwell hid behind religion to say and do terrible things, and in death, he is hiding as well. No, I won't give him a nod of respect for being a reverend. No, I won't recognize a moment of silence for him being a Christian. No, his death provokes discussion of his life, and his life was a wasteland of atrocities against moral compassion and human understanding. So I say, fuck him. I am glad he's dead. The world is absolutely better off. And to your friends, I'd say, if "words mean something," why don't they read some of Falwell's words. If he didn't share a name with their religion, would they still respect him? Just another reason religion demands the halt of rational, reasonable thought, and instead just asserts its authority. You know, here's a thought. Where were your friends with their stern words when Falwell, fresh off the 9-11 attacks, blamed everything on gays and feminists? Where were they when he used a national tragedy for his own political gain? For his personal ideological war? When America was supposed to be united, Falwell was dividing, over the dead bodies of our own citizens. So again, I say, fuck him, good riddance. Comment (1)
I think it's acceptable to join the group without a waiting period. However, Emily Post might suggest you wait a year before actually doing those acts on his grave.
Comment (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
Jul 6, 2008
Indiana State Museum
Among the most memorable shows I’ve seen all year, the exhibition lives up to its claims: There’s nothing sweet about it -- and yet the work is, almost...
Do you think Gov. Daniels and state agencies have appropriately responded to the needs of victims of the recent flooding?
[ view results ]








