Reaction swift to Fourth Amendment ruling 

Slideshow
(Slideshow) Fourth Amendment Rally 5-25-11
(Slideshow) Fourth Amendment Rally 5-25-11 (Slideshow) Fourth Amendment Rally 5-25-11 (Slideshow) Fourth Amendment Rally 5-25-11 (Slideshow) Fourth Amendment Rally 5-25-11 (Slideshow) Fourth Amendment Rally 5-25-11 (Slideshow) Fourth Amendment Rally 5-25-11 (Slideshow) Fourth Amendment Rally 5-25-11 (Slideshow) Fourth Amendment Rally 5-25-11

(Slideshow) Fourth Amendment Rally 5-25-11

A May 25 Fourth Amendment rally following Indiana Supreme Court decision allowing a more liberal standard for police entry into private residences.

By Rebecca Townsend

Click to View 16 slides


Less than two weeks after the Indiana Supreme Court issued its decision in the case of Barnes v. State of Indiana, two teenagers dismayed by the ruling sparked a rally on the Statehouse steps uniting Hoosiers of all political stripes.

Rally participants decried what they see as an inexcusable erosion of the Fourth Amendment, which guarantees citizens the right to be secure in their homes — among other places — unless a probable cause warrant deems the search appropriate.

Justice Steven David, as the author of the court’s majority opinion issued May 12, wrote: “the right to reasonably resist an unlawful police entry into a home is no longer recognized under Indiana law.”

The right to resist illegal police entry into one’s home dates back over 300 years into English Common Law. But David argued that the modern criminal justice system offers people more opportunity than those living under Common Law to restore justice following an unlawful entry and arrest.

David gave more weight to safety issues, noting that “allowing resistance unnecessarily escalates the level of violence and therefore the risk of injuries to all parties…”

The full 8-page opinion, along with two shorter dissenting opinions, are posted online through the Indiana Supreme Court.

Gov. Mitch Daniels, Attorney General Greg Zoeller, legislative leaders and two of the five Supreme Court justices support a rehearing of the case.

“(T)he wholesale abrogation of the historic right of a person to reasonable resist unlawful police entry into his dwelling is unwarranted and unnecessarily broad,” Justice Brent Dickson wrote in his dissenting opinion.

He advocated a narrowing of David’s ruling by defining resistance to police entry into one’s home as unreasonable in the case of domestic violence investigations.

Tags: , ,

Comments

Around the Web

This Week's Flyers

About The Author

Rebecca Townsend

Rebecca Townsend

Bio:
Rebecca Townsend served as NUVO news editor from May 2011 to August 2014. During a 20-plus year career, her bylines have appeared in publications ranging from Indiana AgriNews to the Wall Street Journal. Her undergraduate degree is in sociology and anthropology from Earlham College, and her master's is in journalism... more

Today's Best Bets | All of today's events

Around the Web

All contents copyright © 2017 NUVO Inc.
3951 N. Meridian St., Suite 200, Indianapolis, IN 46208
Website powered by Foundation