Movie review: Star Trek Into Darkness 

***
click to enlarge Zachary Quinto as Spock in Star Trek Into Darkness
  • Zachary Quinto as Spock in Star Trek Into Darkness

SPOILER ALERT: THE FOLLOWING REVEALS MAJOR PLOT POINTS FROM THE MOVIE. For instance, the villain is Khan. You know how everyone connected with Star Trek Into Darkness has spent the last few months saying that the villain of the film would not be genetically-engineered superman Khan Noonien Singh? They were lying. Mind you, the film's version of Khan isn't faintly like the version created by Ricardo Montalban in the Star Trek TV episode Space Seed and more memorably in the ripping good movie Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. But they use the name.

In Wrath, Montalban's Khan became one of cinema's great villains. Decked out into well-styled long hair and Road Warrior-esque clothing with the front cut way down low so you could see his massive, bulging pecs, Khan taunted and seethed and raged. He took William Shatner's famed hamminess and dared to up the ante. What a nerve! What a treat.

Benedict Cumberbatch (Sherlock Holmes) plays Khan in the 2013 version, only for the first hour he pretends to be Commander John Harrison, a Starfleet officer gone rogue. Cumberbatch is very skilled at talking in menacing tones and screaming. He serves as a perfectly fine bad guy, so why slap the burden of the Khan name and legacy on him?

Because director J.J. Abrams (Lost) and his writers (Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman and Damon Lindelof) continue to treat their version of the series as a smorgasbord, that's why. In their first reboot they wrote in an alternate time line twist that allows them to pick and choose bits of Star Trek characters and storylines and then twist them however they see fit. Fair enough and some of it works, but some decisions are simply puzzling.

Before I continue, I should mention that I thought Star Trek Into Darkness was mostly fun as I watched it. It was later that creative decisions started nagging at me.

Back to the puzzling part. Abrams and company seem to think that Trek fans will be delighted to encounter so many references from the TV series and previous movies scattered about with new timeline twists. Not in the case of Khan. Evoking the original character and giving us the new all-grim-and-'roid-rage version is like popping in a Van Halen disc expecting David Lee Roth and getting Sammy Hagar instead. And once new Khan's identity is revealed, his storyline goes from dumb to dumber.

As for the Enterprise crew, not much has changed since the last movie. James Kirk (Chris Pine) remains an intergalactic cocksman prone to acting without thinking and justifying his actions afterwards (the film opens with Kirk and company saving some nice aliens with painted faces by ignoring the Prime Directive and foisting a new spaceship-based belief system on them). Spock (Zachary Quinto) squabbles with his girlfriend Uhuru (Zoe Saldana) in front of others, which seems inappropriate for both his Vulcan and human sides. He gets to yell "Khaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan!" this time and does it with vigor.

As with the original series and the movies, Bones (Karl Urban) gets surly, Scotty (Simon Pegg) gets exasperated and Sulu (John Cho) gets nothing, while Chekov (Anton Yelchin) seems more whiny than usual.

Oh, did I mention that Bones cures death? Yeah, there's a noble sacrifice as in Wrath of Khan (with a kicky twist, natch), but it's quickly undone, because the doctor's experiments with Tribbles and genetically-enhanced superman blood results in a shot that cures death. So Starfleet's got that going for them. Wonder what humanity will do with this serum, which could CHANGE LIFE AS WE KNOW IT ON A FUNDAMENTAL LEVEL? My guess is they'll never mention it again.

Star Trek Into Darkness is fun and full of action. Just don't think. And pretend it's not Khan.

Trailer


Now Playing

Sorry there are no upcoming showtimes for Star Trek Into Darkness

Comments

Around the Web

What others are saying (10)

Creative Loafing Tampa Simon Pegg: Great Scotty! The multitalented Simon Pegg is a geek for all seasons. by Joe Bardi 05/15/2013
Colorado Springs Independent Star Trek Into Darkness is a brutally brilliant film for our times They have ingeniously crafted a Star Trek movie that works equally well for neophytes and devotees by MaryAnn Johanson 05/15/2013
Charleston City Paper Star Trek Into Darkness is a sign of the hopeless times There's something that makes me very sad about Star Trek Into Darkness. by MaryAnn Johanson 05/15/2013
7 more reviews...
Portland Mercury Going, Not Quite Boldly A British gentleman reviews Star Trek into Darkness. by Matt Davis 05/15/2013
Inlander Interstellar Gem There’s no escaping the grim, foreboding title. In this sequel to J.J. Abrams’ good-but-not-quite-great reboot of the universe’s best known sci-fi saga, lots of bad stuff happens. Th by Ed Symkus 05/15/2013
Memphis Flyer Whoop That Trek Franchise reboots can't get much better. by Addison Engelking 05/23/2013
Creative Loafing Tampa Star Trekking at the gates of hell The crew of the Enterprise returns for the workmanlike Into Darkness. by Joe Bardi 05/15/2013
Portland Mercury Prime Directive Achieved! Finally, an American reviews Star Trek into Darkness. by Denis C. Theriault 05/15/2013
The Coast Halifax Star Trek Into Darkness True love and a super terrorist by Jacob Boon 05/23/2013
Tucson Weekly The Reboot Returns Is the new Star Trek a thinly veiled reflection on the drone war? Maybe, but it's still a lot of lens-flared fun by Bob Grimm 05/23/2013

This Week's Flyers

About The Author

Ed Johnson-Ott

Today's Best Bets | All of today's events

Around the Web

All contents copyright © 2016 NUVO Inc.
3951 N. Meridian St., Suite 200, Indianapolis, IN 46208
Website powered by Foundation