Supreme Court uncaps individual election spending 

COURTESY OF SCOUT VIA FLICKR CREATIVE COMMONS
  • Courtesy of Scout via Flickr Creative Commons


By Mary Kuhlman

Another important campaign finance decision handed down Wednesday by the U.S. Supreme Court is provoking both celebration and consternation across the country.

Paul Ryan, senior counsel with the Campaign Legal Center says the 5-to-4 ruling in McCutcheon v. the Federal Election Commission means the voices of most voters will continue to be drowned out by the wealthiest few.

"That's the real impact of today's decision," he says. "Removing the $123,000 cap and now, allowing contributions in excess of $3.5 million to go to candidates and parties, combined."

Groups applauding the ruling include the Cato Institute, which says restricting the total amount a donor can give violates First Amendment rights and does not prevent corruption.

But following the decision, at least 140 protests were held in 38 states and the nation's capital.

Ryan says the McCutcheon ruling, combined with the Citizens United ruling of 2010, opens the floodgates wider to give the wealthy more influence over politicians.

However, he does see a small silver lining.

"The court did in fact leave the door open for more narrowly tailored corruption-preventing policies that Congress might pass, and that state legislatures and city councils across the country could certainly pursue."

Marge Baker, vice president of People for the American Way, says the McCutcheon decision, which she sees as a major threat to democracy, is bound to generate a wide range of responses.

"From amending the Constitution to small-donor public financing proposals," she points out.

Other critics of the decision say the Court is ignoring previous laws passed by Congress, past presidents' decisions to sign those laws, and even the Court's own precedents.

Latest in Politics

  • Loretta Rush will be Indiana's chief justice
  • Loretta Rush will be Indiana's chief justice

    Indiana made history Wednesday afternoon when a nominating panel selected Loretta Rush to be the next chief justice of the Indiana Supreme Court.
    • Aug 6, 2014
  • Ethics inquiry clears INDOT's Woodruff
  • Ethics inquiry clears INDOT's Woodruff

    Four years of investigations surrounding Interstate 69 land deals came to an end Friday when the Indiana inspector generals disclosed that state, local and federal officials would not be pressing charges against highway official Troy Woodruff.
    • Aug 4, 2014
  • Hogsett headed to prominent Indy law firm
  • Hogsett headed to prominent Indy law firm

    U.S. Attorney Joe Hogsett will join the Indianapolis law firm Bose McKinney & Evans when he leaves his federal post on July 31.
    • Jul 28, 2014
  • More »

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Feedback

Recent Comments


More by Indiana News Service

  • Few benefits for workers with visas

    New Indiana University research has found that most temporary workers from Mexico who get work visas are no better off than those who are undocumented.
    • Aug 27, 2014
  • Childhood stress may have lasting effects

    According to a new study, chronic early childhood stress brought on by poverty, neglect and physical abuse can have a lasting, toxic impact.
    • Aug 26, 2014
  • More »

© 2014 NUVO | Website powered by Foundation