Recent stories by
Steve Hammer
No laughing matter
Sep 3, 2008
Advice for Obama
Aug 27, 2008
RIP, trashed apartment
Aug 19, 2008
Wicked games
Aug 13, 2008
Barack, don’t pick Bayh
Aug 6, 2008


Recommended stories

Arts
Boom!
by Editors
Jul 3, 2008

News
Green thoughts on Independence Day
by Lori Lovely
Jul 3, 2002


Who or what gives us freedom?
by Steve Hammer Jul 3, 2008

Is it the soldiers or God?

The Fourth of July is about fireworks, drinking beer, having cookouts and celebrating a day off work while the news media feed you nationalistic propaganda. That’s the way it always has been and likely always will be.

I don’t mind the day off, the fireworks, the beer and the cookouts, to be sure. But I do have problems with the propaganda aspect of July 4. I love this country as much as anyone, but I don’t dig the philosophy embodied in the song “God Bless The USA,” which was popularized during the Reagan years and has been used ever since to accompany every Republican military excursion into foreign lands.

Upon closer analysis, the song gets even creepier. The lyrics start with the narrator saying that if tomorrow everything he’d worked for all his life was gone and he had to start from scratch with just his family — a very real scenario after 25 years of conservative economics — he wouldn’t be sad at all.

In fact, the song goes, “I’d thank my lucky stars to be living here today.” Let me get this straight. Your employer sends your job to India for a tax break and you’re happy? Why? “Because the flag still stands for freedom and they can’t take that away.”

Granted, the American flag is a beautiful one. And the concept of freedom is marvelous. But, like religion, the flag has been used to justify any number of shameful and disgraceful activities over the years. Just in the past 50 years, the flag flew proudly as government officials worked with mobsters to plan assassinations. The soldiers who tortured inmates at Guantanamo Bay and Abu Grahib all wore flag emblems on their uniforms.

I prefer to think of freedom in other ways, but if you want to objectify a piece of cloth and have it embody liberty, that’s fine with me.

The real problem I have with the song is the chorus:

And I’m proud to be an American

Where at least I know I’m free

And I won’t forget the men who died

Who gave that right to me.

Let us parse those four lines. I’m proud to be an American as well, but I’m not quite sure we have the freedom the song would seem to indicate. Leaving aside that argument for a moment, let’s pay attention to those last two lines, because I think they go to the heart of what disturbs me so much about the conservative Republican meaning of patriotism.

“I won’t forget the men who died / Who gave that right to me.” While the sacrifice of fallen American soldiers is indeed something to honor, I take vigorous exception to the implication of that phrase.

It seems to say that the only way to ensure our freedom is for soldiers to die in combat for America. More than that, without the deaths of soldiers, we wouldn’t even have those rights. Therefore, the logic goes, all of our freedom stems from dead soldiers and more must die for us to be free.

Particularly in the past 15 years, but extending back to the Korean War, our soldiers have been used not in defense of America but as pawns for the fulfillment of an aggressive foreign policy. With no disrespect intended toward Vietnam or Gulf War veterans, it can hardly be argued that the soldiers who perished did so to preserve the Bill of Rights.

They died because politicians like Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon and George W. Bush wanted to send a signal to other adversaries and, not coincidentally, make billionaires out of the war industry.

To assert that the death of soldiers in combat is the only thing keeping us from a dictatorship is to dishonor the soldiers as well as our country.

Freedom is not bestowed by the soldiers, or even from the government. In America, freedom is guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, that remarkable document that asserts freedom of speech and religion and equal protection under the law to every human being.

But it goes even deeper than that. I prefer the following line of reasoning.

“The liberty we prize is not America’s gift to the world; it is God’s gift to humanity.”

That’s the one statement from George W. Bush with which I agree wholeheartedly. Ultimately, freedom extends not from the state or the military; it is, like everything else on this earth, a gift from the Almighty.

I am proud of many things about America: the way we unselfishly rebuilt Europe after World War II and the way in which a peaceful revolution in the 1960s extended freedom to black Americans, just to mention two.

We are rightly prideful of our country. But please don’t confuse the chaos of war with the chimes of freedom. There are many evil people who are hoping that you do.

Comments on Who or what gives us freedom?
Freedom
by Jay | Jul 7, 2008

Steve Hammer hit the nail on the head. Republicans, for whatever strange reason, feel they wrote the book on patriotism. It's either their brand of patriotism or, if you don't follow their path, then you hate your country, you hate the troops, you hate Jesus, you hate puppies and girl scouts, etc., etc. They seem to be more about Nationalism than Patriotism. In fact, most Neo-Cons have nothing to do with patriotism. When it comes to Republicans, patriotism is a hollow shell. It has been abused by them beyond belief.

Report this comment

Freedom
by Sam Adams | Jul 7, 2008

All this talk of freedom is nice. But what's going to happen when Kevin gets busted for promoting prostitution?

Report this comment


by USA Gold | Jul 7, 2008

Yeah, what he said.

Report this comment

Wrong Again, Pinhead!
by Jack The Ripple | Jul 7, 2008

I understand people are still sneeking into our borders as opposed to breaking out of them, so I suppose any non-Hammer approved moves in the name of foreign policy over the last half century can't have been all that bad. The Bill of Rights still all seem to apply - and never forget, they were an addendum to the Constitution. You don't have to love Lee Greenwood's lyrics to recognize the sacrifices of America's fighting forces throughout our nation's long history as the price paid for these freedom and liberty you obviously so take for granted and assume are gifts from God like the sunshine and the bluebird. I don't think you have to believe the U.S. is broadly superior to be patriotic — though I think the case could be made that it is better than other countries in fundamental ways. The patriotic impulse to celebrate your country as being better than others is not arbitrary American-ism. I think liberal Democrats are just as susceptible to this particular patriotic impulse as are Republican conservatives. And neither one party or one philosophy have been the single fuse in every armed conflict over the last 50 years. St. John Kennedy raised the number of military advisors in Vietnam from 800 to 16,000 in his short reign. The dread weaknesses of the peanut meddler from Georgia fumbled Afghanistan and gave us the current Iran. You own Mr. Bill meddled poorly on the dark side of the Balkans, yet disregarded the threats and initial attacks of Bin-Ladin. Were all these foreign interventions made for pure profit or perhaps to show strenghth in supporting the spread of democracy, freedom and liberty? You can love your country because you were born here and you can love your country because you rationally appreciate the Bill of Rights and its unique historical impact, yet to deny it was paid for in blood and treasure, and rather somehow had freedom settled upon this one nation through devine benevolence, is pure folly and again displays your total lack of discernible political intellect and, for that matter, godly intervention. Why is it you never extoll us with stirring foxhole tales of your own military service, Mister Hammer? Coloring a nice picture of our flag in this issue would have been preferable. Those colors don't ever seem to run.

Report this comment

NOTE: Comments posted to our web site may be used our "letter to the editor" section of the paper.

Post a comment
/ to /
Sep 7, 2008
Indianapolis Museum of Art
About 120 objects dating from 3600 BC to 400 AD from the world-renowned Egyptian art collection of the Brooklyn Museum will illustrate the range of strateg...
Should Indiana retailers be allowed to sell alcohol on Sundays?
Yes
No













Myspace





© 2007 NUVO, Inc.
Contact Us