Recent stories by
Editors
Thumbs up: Free Thanksgiving dinner
Nov 25, 2008
Thumbs down: Rocky Ripple rip-off
Nov 25, 2008
Thumbs up: The shape you're in
Nov 25, 2008
Thumbs down: New business model needed
Nov 25, 2008
Thumbs up: Taking care
Nov 25, 2008


Recommended stories

News
Blood Sport
by Mary Lee Pappas
Jun 2, 2004

News
Task force on dog fighting
by Sara J. Smith
Sep 26, 2007

News
Blessing the beasts
by Mary Lee Pappas
Mar 31, 2004

News
Animal cruelty measures signed into law
by Editors
Apr 4, 2007

Thumbsup/Thumbsdown
Thumbsup: Dogged reporting
by Editors
Nov 28, 2007

Letters
Pit bulls not the problem
by Letter to the Editor
Jun 6, 2007

Letters
That’s how
by Letter to the Editor
Jun 27, 2007


Tougher laws for dog fighting
by Editors Sep 5, 2007

State senator sees increased fines and penalties

State Sen. Jim Arnold (D-LaPorte) announced last week that he intends to file legislation he claims would make Indiana a national leader in strengthening its dog fighting laws.

The recent arrest and guilty plea by NFL player Michael Vick has reintroduced the horrors of dog fighting to American media and consciousness this summer. A popular and lucrative “sport” — though illegal in all 50 states — the Humane Society of the United States estimates that approximately 40,000 people participate in dog fighting, which profits from both admission fees and gambling. Thousands of dollars in bets can ride on a single fight.

“Dog fighting is one of the most vicious forms of ‘entertainment’ out there,” Arnold said in a prepared statement. “In the last few months we’ve heard a real outcry that we need to make sure our laws about it are as tough as they can possibly be and I intend to answer that request.”

Currently, Indiana law has several provisions governing dog fighting at the state level. Arnold wants to increase penalties for all dog fighting-related activities; Arnold said he has sought input from the National Humane Society to develop the legislation.

• Purchasing or possessing animals for fighting contests is currently a Class D felony. Arnold’s legislation would make it a Class C felony.

• Possessing animal fighting paraphernalia is currently a Class B misdemeanor for a first offense and a Class A misdemeanor for subsequent offenses. Arnold’s legislation would make it a Class A misdemeanor every time.

• Promoting an animal fighting contest is currently a Class D felony. Arnold’s legislation would make it a Class C felony.

• Attending a fighting contest is currently a Class A misdemeanor. Arnold’s legislation would make it a Class D felony.

Class A misdemeanors are punishable by up to a year in prison and a maximum fine of $5,000. Class D felonies are punishable by six months to three years in prison and a maximum fine of $10,000. Class C felonies are punishable by two to eight years in prison and a maximum fine of $10,000.

To further strengthen the protection provided under these laws, Arnold’s bill will include a provision that will prohibit people who have been convicted of dog fighting-related offenses from owning any animal for a period of 10 years. The bill will also define “baiting,” in which smaller animals, often stolen or obtained under false pretenses, are used to train dogs to fight and to weed out less aggressive dogs.

In addition to gambling, the sale and use of drugs and physical violence are all associated with dog fighting. Arnold, the former LaPorte County sheriff, noted that dog fighting is also increasingly associated with gang activity.

“Dog fighting clearly has no place in our communities,” Arnold said. “I want Indiana to be seen as a leader in ending this crime nationally.”

Comments on Tougher laws for dog fighting
Not hogwash
by Ryan | Sep 10, 2007

Yes, near my old neighborhood on the east side of Indy dog fighting was fairly common. It creates a danger to the community when these vicious dogs escape and attack people, which happened to me.

Report this comment

what hogwash!
by woof | Sep 9, 2007

Just what we need, a politician taking advantage of media spotlight and trying to look tough on a horrific but infrequent crime. Yes, there's a lot of attention on the "dogfighting" sport now due to recent celebrities getting put to task. But does anyone YOU know bet on dogfighting or participate in it in any way? It's sad that more attention is put on animals raised for cruel sport than on our fellow humans that are losing their lives around the world in so many other catastrophic conditions, whether it's Iraq, Darfur, New Orleans or the homeless people in your own home town, isn't there something you can do to help the HUMANS on the planet as well? I see this like a house fire, and you make it outside to realize your son and your dog are still inside. Do you run to your son's room first or to the dog's favorite sleeping place? Also, it's insane to think that this bill is doing ANYTHING by upping it from a D felony to a C felony. It is nothing less than BAD LAW-MAKING for us to simply reactively respond to news events by escalating the punishment for whatever the related crime is. Does it make sense for us as a society to put dog-fighting as a more severe offense than child solicitation? I think animals should be treated humanely, but to put them of higher importance than humans is simply animal.

Report this comment

NOTE: Comments posted to our web site may be used our "letter to the editor" section of the paper.

Post a comment
/ to /
Dec 2, 2008
Radio Radio
$9.50 Advance, $10 Door....
Do you have greater interest in the Pacers this year?
Yes
No











Myspace



© 2007 NUVO, Inc.
Contact Us