Recent stories by
Laura McPhee
Republican campaign strategy in Indiana: the other guys are cheating
Oct 14, 2008
Women's work
Oct 1, 2008
Resisting cuts to arts and parks
Aug 27, 2008
Marion Classic races feature speed and skill
Aug 13, 2008
Indiana: still more gray than green
Aug 6, 2008


Recommended stories

Letters
The racist agenda
by Letter to the Editor
Mar 14, 2007

Letters
Godiana
by Letter to the Editor
Mar 21, 2007

Letters
An anachronistic interpretation
by Letter to the Editor
Apr 4, 2007


Letter from an editor
by Laura McPhee Mar 14, 2007

Last week’s cover story, “Evangelical Lobbyist Eric Miller: The Most Powerful Man in the Statehouse” (NUVO, March 7-14, 2007), generated a variety of responses regarding my comparison of contemporary Evangelicals with members of the Ku Klux Klan in the 1920s. 

While many argue that this analogy is either blasphemy or hyperbole, after much research and thought, I concluded it was accurate — a conclusion shared over the past 25 years by a number of people and publications with sharper political minds and keener journalistic skills than mine.

When the Reagan-era “Moral Majority” was the political arm of Evangelicals, scholars such as Seymour Martin Lipset superbly made the comparison in “The Election and the Evangelicals,” published in Commentary magazine in March 1981. The analogy continued in the 1990s with essays such as the one by Bernard Weisberger in American Heritage (April 1992).

In 2006, Salon.com senior writer Michelle Goldberg wrote “Kingdom Coming: The Rise of Christian Nationalism” in which she deftly made the comparison. Last month, an article in The Christian Science Monitor by Brad Knickerbocker convincingly linked the anti-immigrant attitudes of Evangelicals today and the nativism of the KKK during the 1920s.

Locally, no one has done a better job of chronicling the political agenda and influence of Advance America than Gary Welsh at www.advanceindiana.blogspot.com. With his education, experience and insight as a lawyer, lobbyist and Republican, Welsh has astutely pointed out the similarities between the KKK and local Evangelical leaders like Miller and Micah Clark of the Indiana Family Institute for several years, as well as push for an investigation into Advance America’s finances and possible violations or abuses of lobbying regulations. In addition, Bil Browning’s www.bilerico.com does an excellent job of representing the variety of voices within the city’s GLBT community and the growing dissatisfaction with Indiana politics as usual.

Given the number of times I’ve written about Miller in the past and the prevalence of the analogy between Evangelicals and the KKK in public discourse, I mistakenly thought readers would share my presumption that I was joining an ongoing and increasing number of others in pointing out the parallels between Evangelical and KKK influence as it relates to national and state politics, and that my examination included ideas and evidence publicly presented elsewhere.

So to NUVO readers who wrote claiming I am an isolated and extremist voice with an anti-God agenda, those who wrote claiming I am delusional and making this shit up, as well as those who wrote claiming I am trying to pass off the ideas of others as my own, I humbly and loudly admit an unoriginal thesis and openly recommend the work of these predecessors, and in some cases superiors, that also detail the ways in which those who now embrace the agenda of groups like Advance America are following in the footsteps of those who once embraced the Ku Klux Klan.

And as I nervously wait to find out if the tires on my car will be slashed yet again, if additional parents will now refuse to allow their children to play with mine, if the threatened lawsuits will materialize and/or if God will strike me dead, I would also like to offer an apology to California Congressman Henry Waxman.

The spell check function on my laptop got a little ambitious during proofreading, and the last name of Indiana Legislator John Waterman was inadvertently changed to Waxman in this article. Ironic, and kind of funny, but obviously an error.

Comments on Letter from an editor
McPhee's religious slurs
by Shocked | Apr 13, 2007

At a recent ceremony honoring English majors at IUPUI, McPhee took advantage of an opportunity to speak to students about the value of English Studies and turned it into her own political forum by devoting half of her talk to her recent NUVO article on Christians and the KKK -- totally inappropriate for an awards ceremony meant to honor students! Some of those attending probably had little context for her inflammatory comments and heard only that she was equating Christians with the KKK. (Although she later made a vague reference to “what was going on at the Statehouse,” she did not explicitly mention the proposed ban on gay marriage.) While the KKK may claim to be based on biblical beliefs, any thinking person knows that the abhorrent views of the KKK do not represent today’s Christian community – evangelical or otherwise. McPhee declared that her comparison was justified, point-by-point; however, I have heard no reports of evangelical Christians running around in white hoods burning crosses and beating up gays. I’m sure she will argue that she qualified her verbal assault when she said "SOME evangelical Christians”; however, her religious slurs were offensive and insulting to the Christian community as a whole. She apparently believes that it is somehow acceptable to discriminate against Christians as long as you disagree with their views. Christians can exercise their First Amendment rights to express their religious views, and when others choose to discriminate against them in a public forum, they are also exercising their First Amendment rights. However, is this the way to embrace diversity? Diversity means “accepting, respecting, and recognizing individual differences…along the dimensions of race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, socio-economic status, age, physical abilities, religious beliefs, political views, languages, or ideologies.” Perhaps McPhee will recognize this excerpt? It is from the English Department’s diversity statement. Promoting progressive views about one group while bashing another hardly seems to be honoring diversity. Any Christians attending the awards program certainly would have felt no respect, only McPhee’s disdain. I’m sure McPhee will get a good laugh from this message. When she’s done laughing, perhaps she should advise the English Department to find future speakers that respect their diversity statement and don’t model religious intolerance for their students.

Report this comment

Amen to HO-HUM
by Give me a break | Mar 23, 2007

Laura McPee, sorry McPhee, is always writing with presumption. Check your facts, little girly.

Report this comment

History Does Repeat
by GaryS | Mar 21, 2007

I think Laura might enjoy the following brief paragraph from journalist, essayist and proto-libertarian H. L. Mencken, written in 1924: "Four or five years ago, when the Ku Klux Klan first got on its legs, I made certain inquiries into its origin and nature, and came to the conclusion that it was no more than the Anti-Saloon League in a fresh bib and tucker, and that, in consequence, its head men were mainly Baptist and Methodist clergymen. That conclusion, printed in this place [the Baltimore Sun], caused protests, and one amiable Baptist clergyman had at me to the extent of two columns. But who denies the fact today? Surely no one of any intelligence. The Klan, studied at length, turns out to be exactly what the Anti-Saloon League is: a device for organizing the hatreds of evangelical Christians."

Report this comment

NUVO ... irrelevant?
by Woe-be-gone | Mar 17, 2007

You equating Eric Miller’s group to the Klan has to be the most irresponsible piece of “journalism” I’ve read in years. As a life-long liberal, I found it an insult to progressive journalists everywhere. You give liberalism a bad name. No wonder NUVO has become irrelevant.

Report this comment

HEY Fix this code to work consistanty
by Mark | Mar 15, 2007

Laura McPhee is NUVOs finest writer. There I said it. That doesn't mean that ANY writer for NUVO has a realistic political worldview. It's those tiny stretches of the imagination (in order to make a stronger point) that destroys their credibility. There are rules to good writing. One of the main ones is that facts should speak for themselves and that emotions be held in reserve. The KKK comparison to conservative political figures is just a smear and will soon be as tired as comparing all despots to Hitler. Yawn.

Report this comment


by Ho-hum | Mar 15, 2007

I'm kind of sick of Laura McPhee taking up yet more editorial space defending everything she and her writers publish. It's beyond defensive and professional: it's whiny and forum-ish. Write it, publish it and let it go. Leave the debate to readers or cry on the shoulders of your friends over a beer at your favorite pub. In other words, shut up already.

Report this comment

NOTE: Comments posted to our web site may be used our "letter to the editor" section of the paper.

Post a comment
/ to /
Oct 15, 2008
Clowes Memorial Hall
Oct 14-19....
Will you vote early in this year's election?
Yes
No











Myspace



Myspace



© 2007 NUVO, Inc.
Contact Us