Recent stories by
Editors
Thumbs up: Free Thanksgiving dinner
Nov 25, 2008
Thumbs down: Rocky Ripple rip-off
Nov 25, 2008
Thumbs up: The shape you're in
Nov 25, 2008
Thumbs down: New business model needed
Nov 25, 2008
Thumbs up: Taking care
Nov 25, 2008


Recommended stories

Show Reviews
Review: I’d been had
by Amber Kerezman
Nov 15, 2006

News
Pollution, politics and profits
by Laura McPhee
Dec 6, 2006

News
State Senate urged to reject HB 1722
by Editors
Mar 21, 2007

Thumbsup/Thumbsdown
Thumbsdown: Clean coal is a dirty word
by Editors
Aug 29, 2007

Columns
Intimately connected
by Matt Shull
Sep 5, 2007

News
Web exclusive: Concerned citizens speak out against Duke Energy plant
by Matt Shull
Sep 25, 2007

News
Dirty truth about Clean-Coal
by Laura McPhee
Aug 23, 2006

News
The dirty truth about clean coal
by Laura McPhee
Aug 30, 2006

Letters
Green power
by Letter to the Editor
Apr 18, 2007

News
Whaddya gonna do, vote Republican?
by Steven Higgs
Oct 30, 2002

News
Unprecedented opportunity
by Maureen Dobie
Nov 6, 2002

News
Staples goes green
by Kara Archer
Nov 27, 2002

News
Three-eyed fish and hermaphroditic frogs
by Anne Laker
Apr 2, 2003

News
How dirty is Indiana?
by Jack Miller
Mar 17, 2004


Guess who’s getting coal for Christmas!
by Editors Nov 28, 2007

While other states, including Florida, Oklahoma, Kansas, Minnesota, Colorado, Missouri and Arizona, have rejected, cancelled or put on hold plans to build new coal gasification plants, Indiana continues to expand its coal mining, producing, burning and pollution output.

The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission last week approved the operation of a new coal facility in Southern Indiana. Duke Energy requested, and was granted, a decision before the end of November on the construction of the plant that it has touted as a “clean-coal” facility, despite the opposition by environmental and consumer groups. In a statement released after the IURC approval, John Blair, president of Valley Watch, expressed the disappointment of the opponents, and the basis of their concerns.

“It seems that Indiana will be forced by our own government to stay in the 20th century when it comes to energy. Such a huge investment in coal will serve to stifle better investment in efficiency, and renewable forms of energy in this state, which will leave us behind the rest of the world that is seeking to find solutions for global warming instead if exacerbating it,” according to Blair.

Valley Watch is also concerned that Indiana Gov. Daniels will now follow through on his plan to make Southwest Indiana an energy sacrifice zone for the rest of the nation since he has proposed other coal facilities to expand what is already the largest concentration of coal-fired power plants in the world.

Citizens Action Coalition also released a statement opposing the new plant. “Governor Daniels may want this plant, but homeowners throughout Duke’s service territory will pay dearly. The fact is that Wall Street will not invest in such a risky plant unless Duke has government subsidies and a blank check from ratepayers to cover any and all costs.”

Comments on Guess who’s getting coal for Christmas!

NOTE: Comments posted to our web site may be used our "letter to the editor" section of the paper.

Post a comment
/ to /
Dec 1, 2008
Murat Egyptian Room
All Ages....
Do you have greater interest in the Pacers this year?
Yes
No











Myspace



© 2007 NUVO, Inc.
Contact Us