Recent stories by
Letter to the Editor
Neal Cassady vs. Dexadrine
Jul 3, 2008
Enthusiasm is catching
Jul 3, 2008
Screaming
Jul 3, 2008
A world of Hammer people
Jul 3, 2008
You make me think
Jun 25, 2008


Recommended stories

News
Anniversary of a witchhunt
by Steve Hammer
Jan 8, 2003

News
Bush pitches tax cut to local seniors
by Summer Wood
May 14, 2003

Columns
W stands for what?
by Laura McPhee
Sep 22, 2004

Columns
Bush’s dereliction of duty
by Matthew McClure
Sep 22, 2004

Columns
More lost opportunities
by Steve Hammer
Jul 26, 2006

Letters
Impeach or not to impeach
by Letter to the Editor
Nov 29, 2006

News
Lessons of past wars
by David Mason
Mar 26, 2003

Letters
Apples, oranges and Muslims
by Letter to the Editor
Apr 11, 2007

Columns
After the next terrorist attack
by David Hoppe
Aug 1, 2007


Clinton worse
by Letter to the Editor Sep 20, 2006

Come on, Hammer ... you act (like most liberals) as though that the whole country is in shambles — that we are one day off from extinction because of the conservatives’ policies. I am referring to your most recent article in NUVO, “God Bless the Conservatives” (Hammer, Sept. 13-20)

If we really want to make comparisons from a decade ago to today’s almost, seemingly (you love adverbs, don’t you?) one hour off from Armageddon scenarios, let us cruise back a little ... when Mr. Bill Clinton was your man in office.

Good grief, where do I begin? We can start off with Waco, if you want. April 1993. But two months prior we had the first attack on the World Trade Center building. It appears that Osama Bin Laden’s entourage of Al-Qaeda was already in war with this failed attempt to bring down the towers. Yes, towers is plural here because what they had hoped to do was topple one tower into the other. God must have helped us there, huh?

Back to Waco. I’m not even going to defend a bunch of religious fanatics, but I can still remember coming home from college that day and watching the news unfold in sepia tones of tanks rolling up to the Branch Davidian compound. Poor Janet Reno ... she had the biggest balls in that administration. If Waco hadn’t happened, I bet my next two paychecks (which ain’t a lot) that she would have went over to Afghanistan herself and fired a few missiles into Al-Qaeda caves.

Oct. 1993: Black Hawk Down! 18 U.S. commandos were shot, blown apart, and their bodies dragged and butchered on CNN by a Third-World country. What did we do but leave. This was all Bin Laden needed: “The U.S., Clinton ... a bunch of wussies.”

1995: Oklahoma City ... Timothy McVeigh. Men, women and children killed. No more said.

1996: TWA jet blows to pieces over the Atlantic. 200 plus killed.

1997-1998: While Clinton was getting his member waxed, Bin Laden devises numerous plots to attack the U.S.

1999: Columbine. Worst school shooting in U.S. history.

1999: U.S. bombs Yugoslavia (and yes, Clinton went alone without U.N support).

2000: USS Cole attacked in October. 17 sailors killed. Again, we do nothing. Bin Laden laughs in his cave with his 10 wives.

So, let’s look at Bush’s record:

September 11, 2001. The invasion and dethroning of Saddam Hussein,

2003 to current. Weeding out Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan. I guess we can count it, but I don’t think natural disasters belong here.

But I will add Hurricane Katrina because the federal government took a lot of heat, but by our constitution the state and city should have been better prepared when they knew a storm like that was very likely and studied over the years. And as far as the Iraq war goes, we are just being on the offensive end—unlike the prior administration who kept their guard down and made the U.S. look silly and vulnerable.

The point is that every President and his administration will face problems. Horrible problems like 9/11, like Oklahoma City. If we want to digress and say our country is falling apart under President Bush, all we have to do is go back and look what had happened during Clinton’s era. Of course, Bush’s second term isn’t over yet. Who knows, he might catch Clinton.

God help us if that happens!

J. Tucker
Indianapolis
Comments on Clinton worse
repub/demo
by karyn | May 31, 2007

Report this comment


by Anonymous | Oct 7, 2006

Many of the issues you have listed blamming Clinton for are preposterous. Get your facts straight. September 11, 2001, there was no invasion dethroning Saddam Hussein. September 11, 2001 had nothing to do with Saddam or an invasion of Iraq. Saddam was a bad bad man but taking him down or rather not taking him down when we had the opportunity was old daddy Bush's mistake, not Clinton's. The "war on terrorism" in Iraq was just a ruse to further the Bush/Chenney agenda. Just think of the no bid contracts and who is making the most money from this course of action. How about the top secret energy meetings held by Chenney that nobody seems to be able to get any answers for. Let's keep those in mind as we realize that the price of gasoline has fluctuated as much as 50 to 100 percent in the past year. And yes, every president has their trying times. However, honesty and integrity go a long way in leading a country as well as setting an example for those who view our actions. Our leaders need to learn from history that which promotes social stability. MARK MY WORDS, Bush is shaking in his boots fearful that the republicans will loose the Senate and Congress, fearful because he has some nasty skeletons in his closet. Nixon was impeached for a lot less. We won't bother to mention Chenney's conflict of interest by still being paid by Haliburton. We won't mention the Abramoff crookedness and those connected to him that we know about and those that we don't know about. Remember all of those congressmen who hurridly attempted to wash their hands of his money. We won't mention the leak that came from this administration revealing Valerie Plame as a secret operative. A revelation that put into jeopardy the lives of many others who's job is to secure intelligence not to mention impeading the intelligence gathering efforts of the CIA furthering the senseless course of action promoted by this administration. There are so many other issues that we could go on about, but we won't And one last thing to think about: How many lives is the price of peace? If we have to make the ultimate sacrifice, let's make sure that we are doing it for the right things and choosing our path with great trepidation. Let us not just idly stand by and allow killing for peace's sake. Such killing promotes hostility, not peace. Under this administration, the divide between the rich and poor grows larger everyday. The middle class American's have to struggle that much harder to get by. Illegal imigrants are allowed to come into this country and break our laws while this administration is doing its best to justify not enforcing immigration policies. And we are not talking just about immigration laws, lets talk about drug dealing, illegal fire arms, murder. It is in the news every day. I paid a dollar for a button at the earth day event. The message said "If you are not outraged, you are NOT paying attention." Bush's second term isn't over yet. God help us if he isn't put into check soon. T Godsey

Report this comment

NOTE: Comments posted to our web site may be used our "letter to the editor" section of the paper.

Post a comment
/ to /
Jul 5, 2008
Indiana State Museum
Among the most memorable shows I’ve seen all year, the exhibition lives up to its claims: There’s nothing sweet about it -- and yet the work is, almost...
Do you think Gov. Daniels and state agencies have appropriately responded to the needs of victims of the recent flooding?
Yes
No










Myspace



© 2007 NUVO, Inc.
Contact Us