An ax to the arts
by David Hoppe Aug 6, 2008
I guess they just don’t believe it.
The people, that is, who hold the purse strings in this city. They don’t believe what they hear about the impact of the arts in Indianapolis — because if they did, they wouldn’t be contemplating deep cuts to the city’s arts budget.
That’s the buzz making its way around arts organizations. At the moment, it’s a rumor. But it’s a rumor with heft, given recent news of local budget woes coupled with our new mayor’s promise to cut $70 million worth of “fluff” from the city’s budget over the next three years.
Obviously, when you’re cutting fluff, you have to start someplace. You might wish, though, that whoever wields the knife might show a little common sense.
Some history is in order. Up until 1999, Indianapolis had one of the lowest levels of public arts funding for a city its size in the United States. The annual allocation through the Department of Parks and Recreation was $750,000. This comparatively paltry sum constrained the local nonprofit arts scene. That’s because public arts funding should be thought of as a kind of venture capital for new ideas. It’s a way for a community to invest in itself. Without upfront money to prime the pump, the local arts economy had a hard time gaining traction in a marketplace dominated by commercial interests.
This began to change when Bart Peterson became mayor and the arts and culture became part of his public policy agenda. Over eight years, public arts funding grew to $1,543,500 — a respectable amount compared to peer cities, if a drop in the bucket given the city’s overall budget of over $1 billion.
This investment paid off. The current economic impact of the arts on Indianapolis is estimated to be $468 million. The arts also generate $52 million in taxes each year. In short, for every dollar the city puts toward the arts, it gets $5 back.
But the city has been living beyond its means in other areas. Not only did we have to borrow $234 million to get through the first half of this year, we’re having to borrow $154 million more to get into 2009. Budget cuts are expected across the board.
This is where those rumors come in. Word has it that the city administration could be thinking of cutting public arts funding by a third in 2009, with another cut of $500,000 in 2010 and possibly eliminating what’s left by 2011.
What gives these rumors their extra heft is the fact that last September, City-County Councilor Bob Cockrum proposed cutting public funding for the arts back to a pre-Peterson level of $793,000 — an amount, Cockrum magnanimously pointed out, actually 5 percent higher than under Peterson’s predecessor.
Since then, Greg Ballard has taken over as mayor. Bob Cockrum is president of the City-County Council.
And Indianapolis is on the verge of acting like the 21st century never happened.
If arts cuts of this magnitude should come to pass, they will not only represent a flagrant disregard for the positive impact of smart public investment, but a willful refusal on the part of the city’s leadership class to recognize the role the arts play in making Indianapolis a worthwhile destination for college students, young professionals and those of us who continue to hope that this city might one day make its quality of life something more than a happy accident.
Over at the Arts Council, they’re planning on bringing in the police chief from Providence, R.I., to talk at the annual Start With Art lunch about how he’s used the arts to help fight crime. I hope this gets some policy-makers’ attention, but I doubt it will. We’ve been down this road before — showing how the arts can play a part in everything from neighborhood redevelopment to higher math scores. All of these things are verifiably true. But they also miss the larger, really crucial point.
As long as people are incapable of being moved by the intrinsic value of the arts, it will be easy for them to dismiss the arts as just another form of recreation, a luxury item or, worse, fluff. And it won’t matter how many facts and studies you have on your side, if the people you’re trying to convince don’t feel like they have to believe you, they won’t.
Comments on An ax to the arts
Artists unite!
by Local Musician | Aug 17, 2008
Forgive my rambling, but there is a point.
My girlfriend will not to move to Indy because it doesn't offer as much culture as other great cities like Chicago, Seattle, Austin, etc. I LOVE Indy. But as an artist, I can see her point.
There's two issues at hand here - creating a more enriching education for our youth and advancing the cultural value of our city. Both are very important. Public money is always a big hurdle. The bottom line is that the arts just aren't seen as profitable. As a professional musician, teacher, and music volunteer for years, from a personal standpoint, I can agree. The cliche "starving artists" comes to mind. When it comes to city funding, I suppose the money has to go towards things that the city deems more profitable? Tough to convice politicians that by culturally enriching your town, it will draw more people. Guess that didn't pan out in the spreadsheet.
So, let's come up with alternative solutions. There's a plethera of talented artists and musicians in this city. We need to band together and volunteer. We need to volunteer at after-school programs. If arts education is the future of our youth, it's up to the artists to make this happen. If we're concerned with art education raising math scores, WE either need to offer our services as music instructors OR math and science tutors. Both will get the job done.
Being an artist can be frustrating. We could be as talented as a rocket scientist, yet not make a dime from it. That said, let's reward ourselves by enriching the community, which will hopefully create a more cultural environment for our city, and then maybe my girlfriend will move here.
Peace.
Report this comment
Hoppe
by MF | Aug 11, 2008
Obviously Hoppe doesn't get it! From a guy who doesn't like billboards and doesn't realize that Vegas is the greatest city in the US! Pathetic!
Report this comment
O.K.
by arts guy | Aug 8, 2008
I think that the people of Indianapolis should look at the places in the world where people want to live and realize the very strong presence of arts and culture. If we want Indianapolis to be one of those places we should all continue to support and ask our leadership to focus resources on these areas. I moved here from the city of Detroit and was pleasantly surprised and encouraged by the vibrant and growing arts community, we should not let this be removed from our city, Indianapolis has a unique opportunity to become as great a city as Chicago and continue to be a wonderful place to live. Name calling and negative information is not helping! Even if you don't agree with the above writer you need to decide if you think the arts are important enough to work with the current system to keep the arts in our city.
Report this comment
Okay, this is enough mis-information
by Citizens for Truth | Aug 7, 2008
Please Mr. High and Mighty, get your facts straight before posting. Individual artists do not receive funding from the city/tax payers or any other public entity here. For the most part,on a national level that all ended in the 80s for heaven's sake. I too received a Creative Renewal Fellowship from the Arts Council like David Hoppe and his wife and guess what, not a penny came from public funds. That, like their new fellowship for emerging artists comes from private sources and foundations. The Creative Renewal money comes from a grant the Arts Council seeks and receives from Lilly Endowment. By the way, "part of his income?" That was one grant, one year. I hardly consider Hoppe or myself on the payroll for that. It is also the case that the panel who chooses those artists and the admin support for that grant is also paid for by the grant from Lilly so what exactly has David Hoppe received of this public funding - this so-called Slush Fund? Explain, please. By the way, 250 local artists have received the same grant FROM LILLY ENDOWMENT thanks to the Arts Council.
Report this comment
Re: Mr High & Mighty
by dj shiva | Aug 6, 2008
Your muckraking still doesn't validate slashing the arts budget. Fair enough to dig deeper into the writer, but there are plenty of us who get NONE of the public arts funding who still support it, and dread more politicians cutting the arts because they are too obtuse to recognize the value of it.
Seriously, does Indy really need to be ANY more backwater and dumb?
Report this comment
Pony Up David!
by Mr. High & Mighty | Aug 6, 2008
Nuvo prides itself in prodding politicians into divulging their private and public financial information. As it should be. But what about Nuvo? Third rate polemicist, David Hoppe decries the anticipated budget cuts at the Arts Council of Indianapolis. But does he give his reasons for concern? No. Well, let me tell you a little about third-rate writer David Hoppe. Part of his income is derived from the Arts Council of Indianapolis. So does his wife. Have you ever noticed, he is a big supporter of public financing of the arts? I would be too, if I derived part of my income from the public trough. What about public disclosure? Any ethical journalist would disclose the fact that he lines his pockets at the public’s expense before writing in support of public financing of the arts.
Hoppe, not only are you a “wanna-be” writer, you’re an unethical and disingenuous writer. Eventually, your readers will out you. Oh, and by the way David, is “Kevin the Pimp” aware of your secret slush fund?
Report this comment
Post a comment